ScopeframeResearch for property claims buyers

Scorecard · Question 3

Use the following 100-point allocation as the default.

What are the recommended weights?

Scopeframe research deskSection 09Page 4 of 18Updated 20 October 2026

Agree any changes before opening bids or viewing pilot outcomes.

Criterion Weight Primary scorer
1. Total cost per accepted file 20 Finance and procurement
2. Technical quality and first-pass acceptance 20 Technical claims and QA
3. Evidence traceability and auditability 12 QA and records management
4. Claims authority, rule governance and automation control 10 Claims leadership and counsel
5. Integration, version integrity and exportability 10 Enterprise architecture
6. Security, privacy and subprocessor control 8 Security and privacy
7. Time to usable file and exception handling 7 Claims operations
8. Catastrophe capacity and continuity 6 Operations and vendor management
9. Commercial clarity and exit terms 4 Procurement and legal
10. Implementation, people and operating ownership 3 Transformation and frontline management
Total 100

For a catastrophe-first purchase, increase resilience weight only before testing and preserve the mandatory gates. For complex commercial property, build a separate technical rubric rather than assuming that residential results transfer.

Avoid double counting: criterion 2 scores whether the file is correct; criterion 3 scores whether the reviewer can reconstruct its support. Criterion 5 tests whether an export works; criterion 9 tests the contractual right, price and assistance to obtain it.