ScopeframeResearch for property claims buyers

Scorecard · Question 6

What should the claim file acceptance checklist contain?

Scopeframe research deskSection 09Page 7 of 18Updated 20 October 2026

Acceptance should mean that the production package meets a versioned carrier standard—not that the claim is covered, payable, settled or closed. Keep those decisions separate in both workflow permissions and reporting.

The following is a proposed property insurance claim file quality assurance checklist. Tailor it to the loss, jurisdiction and carrier requirements; do not treat it as an exhaustive investigation standard.

Acceptance area Required check
Identity and completeness Correct claim, property and assignment; all required outputs present and readable
Inspection evidence Relevant photographs, measurements and notes are indexed; missing or conflicting evidence is explicitly flagged
Scope and quantities Included and omitted work can be explained; quantities reconcile to the sketch, measurement or documented calculation
Estimate settings Applicable price-list version, location and carrier-approved settings are recorded; adjustments are explained
File consistency Narrative, photographs, sketch, estimate and QA findings do not materially contradict one another
Exceptions Uncertainty, specialist questions and coverage-related issues are escalated without invented conclusions
Approval and portability Required review occurred; edits and reviewer identity are recorded; editable and readable deliverables work as specified

Verisk’s published QR material describes separate review workflows, comparison of original and corrected estimates, reviewer calibration and checks involving measurements, scope and documentation. It establishes that such review functions exist; it does not establish a universal acceptable error rate. (verisk.com)

How should errors be classified?

Adopt a carrier-approved severity rubric before scoring:

  • Critical: fabricated evidence, wrong-claim contamination, unauthorised decision/action or another defect with potentially serious consumer, legal or security consequences. Contain, investigate and retest before continuation.
  • Material: unsupported or omitted scope, significant quantity error, wrong assumptions or another defect requiring substantive correction before the file is usable.
  • Minor: a defect that requires correction but does not materially change the technical content or decision support.
  • Preference only: an optional presentation change that does not fail the published standard.

Record overstatement and understatement separately. Do not allow them to cancel each other in a net dollar-error measure. A lower estimate is not, by itself, a better production outcome under this scorecard.

Sources cited on this page

  1. verisk.comverisk.com